WITB · CFB RESEARCH LAB
Texas A&M BY THE NUMBERS
- Conference
- SEC
- Record
- 2-1
- Conf. Record
- 0-1
Offense
2026 season
Passing TDs
7Ranks 29 of 138 in the FBSCompletion %
58.9%Ranks 102 of 138 in the FBSRushing Yards
515Ranks 63 of 138 in the FBSRushing TDs
6Ranks 52 of 138 in the FBSYards / Carry
4.40Ranks 74 of 138 in the FBSBalanced schedule
71Average opponent win-percent rank over the last 3 gamesHighest-ranked opponent faced
Arizona State39th in win %Won 48-20 · HomeLowest-ranked opponent faced
Missouri State126th in win %Won 50-0 · HomeOpponent quality is that opponent's real season win percentage - it does not adjust for injuries or which quarterback started that day.
What the numbers show
- Texas A&M's Passing TDs ranks 29 of 138 - its strongest real signal in this unit.
- Texas A&M's Completion % ranks 102 of 138 - its weakest real signal in this unit so far.
Real numbers only - computed from actual recorded games, not a prediction or AI-generated analysis.
Defense
2026 season
Pass Yards Allowed
536Ranks 44 of 138 in the FBSPass TDs Allowed
4Ranks 67 of 138 in the FBSInterceptions
3Ranks 96 of 138 in the FBSRush Yards Allowed
308Ranks 41 of 138 in the FBSRush TDs Allowed
2Ranks 21 of 138 in the FBSSacks
4Ranks 30 of 138 in the FBSTFL
14Ranks 40 of 138 in the FBSBalanced schedule
71Average opponent win-percent rank over the last 3 gamesHighest-ranked opponent faced
Arizona State39th in win %Won 48-20 · HomeLowest-ranked opponent faced
Missouri State126th in win %Won 50-0 · HomeOpponent quality is that opponent's real season win percentage - it does not adjust for injuries or which quarterback started that day.
What the numbers show
- Texas A&M's Rush TDs Allowed ranks 21 of 138 - its strongest real signal in this unit.
- Texas A&M's Interceptions ranks 96 of 138 - its weakest real signal in this unit so far.
Real numbers only - computed from actual recorded games, not a prediction or AI-generated analysis.